A scarcity of miracles

Speaking of parodies, a journalist has a 'parody' to mention:

 "The bus to the Momentum conference in Liverpool leaves at seven on a Sunday morning in late September from Euston Station, and the whole journey feels like a parody of a neoliberal play about the failings of socialism. We depart an hour late because activists have overslept and we cannot go without them."

Given the Trot insistence on the theory of 'exploitation,' this seems rather to be a socialist parody of whatever this reporter supports. The recent 'right' in the neoliberal stalwart of the USA have seen increasing 'alt right' tendencies bemoaning the persistence of 'cultural Marxism.' No doubt this brave reporter has opted to attempt to exorcise any traces of cultural Marxism or socialism generally from British politics. Although they try to dissociate from these 'neoliberals,' it goes without saying that expecting a political tendency to consign itself to the void without resistance is expecting it to be other than it is. They are more 'neoliberal' than such playwrights, who nonetheless exult in their vulgarised presentation of a nuanced doctrine. Parodying socialism in a capitalist society is like writing a scathing play denouncing National Socialism, a trite commonplace and redundant at this point.

In any case, their derogatory tirade about Corbyn supporters being like 'drug addicts' is a mere personal attack and reduces things to a passive-aggressive rant. Donald Trump is better at angered ranting, for all of his flaws. Regardless, it is a rather out-of-place and demeaning characterisation. As a 19th Century vampire once noted, "I never called upon you and received a courteous reception, and then insulted you." What, then, are we to make of their later 'discussion' of Karl Marx? Presumably they 'talked' about Karl Marx as alcoholics stumble into passing strangers. And the Labour Party is afflicted with a weird case of 'blurred vision,' when people can pass themselves off as allies when they would have the Party and politics generally preach and work against you.

They piously mourn:

"MSM, they might call me – mainstream media. What it really means is: collaborator"

Of course, it could be that they were hoping to group together based on their political dedication, rather than to have people turn up looking to wantonly insult them in public. "I'm a journalist looking to talk about how you lot are drug addicts and generally despicable," seems like a dubious introduction. 

Of course, it's Jeremy Corbyn's supporters who are the real drug addicts in a political sphere where the main alternatives are people who declare war over WMDs that aren't there, and Conservatives. One might wait for the no doubt stringent personal attacks the journalist was planning on delivering to these people, but it does not come - somehow. Indeed, the journalist seems to have no substantial commitment to a movement opposing significant tendencies of the present society. Evidently a supporter of anything nearing radical politics, which tends to work from an unfavourable position and an inimical society, would not weigh as a con of Corbyn that he does not instead work in harmony with the ruling system and hence have an easier task. Before one undertakes a task, says Jesus, one must weigh up the 'sacrifices' that it entails and whether you wish to take all of these. Yet seemingly anything else is met with opprobrium and denigration. And no doubt they would approve of moving Momentum out of the spotlight so that the Labour Party can be dedicated to further such attack on the Corbynites and their politics. If you would prefer something else, you are for working against Corbyn's politics - which is incredibly mild and not in the least radical. Let alone when you attack them like that while disregarding the political context where many would indeed appreciate dismissing the radical left and rubbing them 'further' into the dirt.

The general position of, "I'm your ally, really, but I hope you all die and find nothing more despicable," seems only particularly good for one thing: mud-slinging, and throwing around allegations concerning things that were said, while seeming to remain credible.

The journalist's complaints reach the following crescendo:

"The maddest suggestion I hear is that all media should be state-controlled so that they won’t be rude about a future Corbyn government and any tribute colouring books."

If there is a problem with this alleged suggestion, they are not doing a good job of it.

Yet let us end on the following note:

9/11: Cultural reptilian Marxism, birds, or the Grim Reaper?

In discussing the insidious influence of cultural reptilian Marxism, few events stand out as much as 9/11. Despite rumours of government interference, it seems more likely that reptilians were involved than either the US government or rogue birds. This might seem obvious to some, but nonetheless these are the other popular explanations. The attack struck the World Trade Centre, a financial centre. "Well, alright, that seems like orthodox Marxism," you might say. However, it did this by hijacking flights and altering their direction, in order to head straight into a pair of buildings. The co-ordination necessary for all of this seems more characteristic of a reptilian socialist than occasional terrorists. In addition, the cultural influence of reptilian socialists is furthered by the stressing of their dominance over American society.

The reptilians have effectively infiltrated American society, and could easily tear down buildings which they dislike. This serves to remind Americans of their continuing power over them. Like the 'Black Nobility,' they can arbitrarily discard that which they once valued. This is a conniving decision more characteristic of the reptilian mind than the US government. In addition, attacks by aeroplanes are a powerful symbol in America - in part for historical reasons. That this would all lead to war could hence be precisely calculated by conniving reptilians. The planes, you might say, resemble birds or flying fish more than lizards. This has indeed led some to blame the attack on rogue birds. This accusation is backed up by several close observations on the flight of swallows. Indeed, it seems peculiar that an image which appears, in silhouette, as a flock of birds banging into trees or lamp-posts, could be so immediately evocative and symbolic to the American. Even in silhouette, it can be found disturbing. However, the correct conclusion to draw from this is that it is not the imagery of flying birds, but the hidden reptilian symbolism that the American consciousness finds disturbing. Hence, it must be of reptilian basis, or it would provide little of worth as imagery goes.

A prominent reptilian socialist teaching is that of 'dislodged infrastructure.' According to this, capitalist society is prone to occasionally dislodging parts of its infrastructure - whether normal infrastructure or 'human (non-reptilian) infrastructure. This must be furthered to hasten its decline and replacement by a lizard utopia. This principle is followed in their attempts at cultural encroachment in Western societies, and hence it would be no surprise if it was attempted in this occasion. According to the 'lizarduationist' school of reptilian socialists, such dents in the infrastructure of 'human' reality allow for reptilians to assert their influence in explicit ways. Hence, the perpetrators would seem to be influenced by this. It would also need little prompting to realise that given the patterns the US follows, a war perhaps involving Europe would soon follow. Hence, the reptilians were following recognised patterns, with the Hope of influencing the West generally. Nonethess, Western states could not react with the same fear if this did not evoke in each of them the sense of an immediate threat and polarity - it would not be evocative if the enemy were not in each one. However, this fear would soon be considered near-mandatory. Hence, reptilian influence would soon have to spread through and into all of these countries, until they could take part in this 'world order.' As reptilians are covert, this hence allowed their influence to spread notably.

As a result, it is clear that reptilian influence in this action should be investigated thoroughly. Others have drawn on similarities between the overall figure formed and a scythe, suggesting that it is a result of the Grim Reaper manifesting its destructive power. Hence, the USA and its towers are also a part of what disturbs about the spectacle - it is no longer a scene of contact, but of unanimous destruction by the Reaper. While this seems convincing, the Grim Reaper has few ties to the politics of the attack, which may hence be attributed to reptilian socialists. As a result, the deadly influence of cultural reptilian socialism, that a Trump administration must steadfastly combat, is clearly manifested in the North American event of 9/11.

A caustic criticism of the previous post by a Reptilian Socialist

Greetings, fellow lizardes.

This 'Zero' evidences a peculiar liking for fascist action, all this time ignoring the fundamental character of reptilian socialism. Regardless of the further results, reptilian socialism - and some might call us sectarian for this - are insistent about the reptilian nature of our cause being uncompromised. We do not advocate actions which might compromise us, such as publically listing active reptilians. The more people rush forwards, the more easily they can be manipulated by us reptilians. Although they do us a useful service in disseminating our propaganda, we must avoid elevating mere 'action' without determination - which is a chimera - into a virtue. Further, we cannot lapse into an arbitrary sophism - we must have reasons for choosing this way or that, we cannot both support sophism and then restrict the available sophisms. We cannot speak of an 'action' without abstraction until it is done. We might well then prefer to eschew such talk. We are surprised that 'Zero' can say such things in a serious manner.

Quite apart from the virtues of fascism and our moral objections to it, it diverges from the true reptilian form. It might be said that fascism is like a lizard - if you cut off its tail, it keeps on going, just as defining 'fascism' proves difficult. It might also be said that 'Zero Nowhere' does not declare themselves a Nazi or fascist in the article. They do not even declare their support for death camps, or write '88' everywhere. That is true, and you might ask why we are then spending so much time on this one element. Nonetheless, it goes without saying that fascists are not to be applauded for spreading 'fascism,' enacting genocide and so on. Nor are we to participate in public displays of mourning which are covert means of promoting bourgeois politicians. People have many intentions that we do not support, we would therefore rather avoid these. We would therefore rather demand people of beliefs that will not harm or annoy us, before we demand they enact these.

We contend that attacking people for not doing 'something' is merely a dishonest attempt at having them do something for you. All beliefs limit certain actions. It is hence not 'socialism,' but the lack of beliefs, which holds this limitation to be bad per se. Yet to type, just as to do anything else, is to act with a purpose - and often a more sophisticated one. It is only this kind of action that allows us to determine our actions or whatever else in a way which is not merely passive. Hence, we must not disparage socialists for being - socialists. If we did, one might well question our purpose. However, we are true-blue reptilian socialists, and hold dogmatically to the tenets of lizard socialism. We are not reptilian Nazis, whatever they may be called.

Hence, if you would request something of us lizard socialists, then be careful. Although reptilians might seem innocuous due to our control of pop music and favouring of it as a means of propaganda, we are actually quite ferocious. If a person or group declares themselves 'socialist,' they will first have to qualify this in several ways or they will be conflated with other things. Yet they were attempting to explain their beliefs, and must hence continue on. One would conclude that they cannot truly have a problem with such things. Our use of music has often been attacked and rebuffed, and eventually we discovered that it was - like bourgeois politics - flashing lights which encourage people to continue on in the system. Hence, we merely coquette with it - as it is more fit for prostitutes than true reptilians. Besides, despite its claims the call to 'action' as such has little clear appeal: in a political and partisan context people are 'talking,' they are not running into each other. Hence, the range of 'actions' involved is limited. We feel that all action to get 'what people want' tends to be mediated, and otherwise spills out into crime. We would rather avoid 'action' which is consequential but problematic. We make few demands, but stringent limitations. Hence, we hope that the article's author understands our reluctance about the article and what it advocates.

Genocide in action (is much better) [satire]

Despite its many flaws, fascist movements have often had the leftist virtue of action. They have murdered, declared wars and organised death camps. As leftists, we must no doubt applaud all of this. Otherwise we would not be true socialists. We would be something else - fascists, for instance. Although we object to fascism, their going ahead and killing people - which is what they believe in - is a good thing and much better than any alternative. If we are to have any criticism of 'National Socialists,' it is that they do not call themselves instead, 'Cosmic socialists,' for the indeed colossal size of their socialism.

Hipster Nazism, in point of its beliefs, is essentially correct - it doesn't believe in much, and is into Nazism for its admittedly sophisticated aesthetic. However, they ought to go further and kill people on this vague basis. As long as people kill others, what does it matter what they believe or why they do this? Blind faith is such a positive spur, that all communists should be Catholics and vice versa. Instead of asking whether we like a pet, we should commit bestiality. And possibly hope for the best. Instead of considering drugs, poisons and so on, we should do them - and then be too incapacitated to determine things anyway. Forgive us if this sounds like an advertisement for the WWE or a dicey product.

Hence, although humans often act consciously, we must follow the character in Dracula and profess a communism of sleep-walking. Then they could admittedly murder people, but in their sleeping actions they are truly communist. Although capitalism is a society centred around the 'hope' of indefinite monetary accumulation and ever-increasing acquisition, it requires as its concomitant a 'socialism' and Church that wishes piously for all of these hopes to occur. Yet some of them cannot - they are caught up in contradictions, and once enacted undermine themselves. However, communism resides where actions fail, not where they succeed. We must hence abandon communism for cheerleading - and indeed many 'socialists' would wish to be major capitalists or capitalist spokesmen 'in practice.' But they are hemmed in from this latter aim by something else, whatever you may wish to call it. Hence, it is against this other element that they have declared a Crusade. Then it need be no surprise that the Labour Party supported the Iraq War - it was enacted with a fervent lack of consideration. Some would say that it was a 'sophism' in favour of a given class or nation, which is their right; others that it was disorganised. Yet it seems then that New Labour are the true 'socialists.'