You lose track of your identity, because most people are NPCs. You start to blend into the community, finding that you belong and are accepted. However, due to this you start to feel oppressed by the dehumanising effect of the 'NPC meme.' You are also outraged when you hear that some people apparently have 'internal thoughts,' and you ridicule them by saying that they hear voices in their head. This clearly cements your status as an NPC, and hence you seek to redress the wrong done to NPCs by the dehuminising critics. You hence set off to slay a dragon, who has used the NPC meme. This resembles the film 'NPC Wars III: Revenge of the NPCs'. So you set off, to fight the dragon.
This leaves you with three options:
a) Proceed on a quest to the dragon's abode, by starting a trek up the dragon's treacherous mountain.
b) Gather resources for your trip to reach the dragon, allowing you to delay your encounter with the dragon until it appears vulnerable.
c) Get offended.
d) Become a metalhead NPC, and try to slay the dragon with the 'power of metal,' something that you read about in a Dragonforce comment section on YouTube. Post on metal forums about your political views before that, and how they convinced you to slay the dragon.
Good luck, NPCs.
Thursday, 8 November 2018
Friday, 19 October 2018
Greetings, NPCs
A sort of game.
Our resident NPC pet is currently experiencing a problem. They feel dehumanised by the 'NPC meme' currently going around, and they wish to slay a dragon to prove their status as an honourable person. How should they proceed?
Choose one option in the comments:
a) Proceed on a quest to the dragon's abode, by starting a trek up the dragon's treacherous mountain.
b) We should not focus on dragons. Only communist revolution will lead to a truly human society, and a full development of human nature. Foster revolutionary sentiment. Then the NPC will - by the dictates of humanist Marxism - truly assume their place as a human, even though they still wouldn't be human or persons.
c) Get offended.
d) It is hopeless to pursue the dragon, it is too fierce and will not be slain by such a frail attempt. In harmony with the dictates of anti-draconic nihilism, do not bother with fighting the dragon. Become pessimistic, and try to escape from your activist programming.
e) Gather resources for your trip to reach the dragon, allowing you to delay your encounter with the dragon until it appears vulnerable.
f) Lose track of your identity, because most people are NPCs.
g) Get offended.
Our resident NPC pet is currently experiencing a problem. They feel dehumanised by the 'NPC meme' currently going around, and they wish to slay a dragon to prove their status as an honourable person. How should they proceed?
Choose one option in the comments:
a) Proceed on a quest to the dragon's abode, by starting a trek up the dragon's treacherous mountain.
b) We should not focus on dragons. Only communist revolution will lead to a truly human society, and a full development of human nature. Foster revolutionary sentiment. Then the NPC will - by the dictates of humanist Marxism - truly assume their place as a human, even though they still wouldn't be human or persons.
c) Get offended.
d) It is hopeless to pursue the dragon, it is too fierce and will not be slain by such a frail attempt. In harmony with the dictates of anti-draconic nihilism, do not bother with fighting the dragon. Become pessimistic, and try to escape from your activist programming.
e) Gather resources for your trip to reach the dragon, allowing you to delay your encounter with the dragon until it appears vulnerable.
f) Lose track of your identity, because most people are NPCs.
g) Get offended.
Deus Wilt
The Catholic church's views on mastupration and other expressions of sexual desire lead to the following conundrum: the ordinary Catholic should marry and have sex, but they should not want to marry and have sex. They have, however, an easy solution which allows them to find an appropriately undesirable mate: marrying a Catholic.
In this simple solution, some might see the elegance of God's hand directing matters, and suggest that they have found a reason for why this Church - which claims to have killed the Cathars and declared Crusades - is to be sanctified and is not on any count to be abandoned.
God might love us all, but why do Christians speak as if they know exactly how God feels? It is because the Christian constructs God, only for God - with the help of his priests - to dismantle the Christian.
In this simple solution, some might see the elegance of God's hand directing matters, and suggest that they have found a reason for why this Church - which claims to have killed the Cathars and declared Crusades - is to be sanctified and is not on any count to be abandoned.
God might love us all, but why do Christians speak as if they know exactly how God feels? It is because the Christian constructs God, only for God - with the help of his priests - to dismantle the Christian.
Monday, 1 October 2018
'Trust Our Corporation to Inform You'
A particularly egregious image. Reddit decide that it is up to them to define the subversive-sounding 'communism' and explain it to concerned users:
You suppose that this represents their determination that, "At reddit we care deeply about not imposing ours or anyone elses’ opinions on how people use the reddit platform."
They also re-directed users of some sub-reddits to an image of 'positive masculinity' written by someone accused of sexual violations. This seems to display that modern liberals cannot turn a stone (or a 'new leaf') without finding something offensive under it. Liberals panic when they are offended, and they find ways to find just about anything offensive. Liberals find themselves oppressed by something like the dystopian society of the 'Hunger Games,' caught in an oppressive and offensive labyrinth of their own making.
(Social media sites like Reddit can be troubling, because they centralise social media and the forum, in a way that leads to a corporate pseudo-monopoly being granted the keys to public discourse.)
However, there has been a recent trend of politically-motivated censorship on social media websites. This has been applauded by modern liberals, which in this case reveals the emptiness of their ideology.
The recent move by corporations and their allied corporate-backed pseudo-liberal websites to bar disliked politics should be seen as disturbing. They have no right whatsoever to dictate people's politics or to make statements which even tangentially concern politics, and they are the fundamental problem with the world system and with politics.
We should not be encouraging (as some 'leftists' do) this setting up of monopolising corporate ideology as the standard of political acceptability in various channels of communication.
You suppose that this represents their determination that, "At reddit we care deeply about not imposing ours or anyone elses’ opinions on how people use the reddit platform."
They also re-directed users of some sub-reddits to an image of 'positive masculinity' written by someone accused of sexual violations. This seems to display that modern liberals cannot turn a stone (or a 'new leaf') without finding something offensive under it. Liberals panic when they are offended, and they find ways to find just about anything offensive. Liberals find themselves oppressed by something like the dystopian society of the 'Hunger Games,' caught in an oppressive and offensive labyrinth of their own making.
(Social media sites like Reddit can be troubling, because they centralise social media and the forum, in a way that leads to a corporate pseudo-monopoly being granted the keys to public discourse.)
However, there has been a recent trend of politically-motivated censorship on social media websites. This has been applauded by modern liberals, which in this case reveals the emptiness of their ideology.
The recent move by corporations and their allied corporate-backed pseudo-liberal websites to bar disliked politics should be seen as disturbing. They have no right whatsoever to dictate people's politics or to make statements which even tangentially concern politics, and they are the fundamental problem with the world system and with politics.
We should not be encouraging (as some 'leftists' do) this setting up of monopolising corporate ideology as the standard of political acceptability in various channels of communication.
The TOTALCOMMUNIST übermensch eschews love and tolerance.
Sunday, 16 September 2018
A More Honest Political Compass
There are many graphs akin to the 'political compass' on the internet, all of which claim to portray the political spectrum and the nature of your politics. We thought we would post an improved version. It is similar to the previous political compasses, however now we have edited them to properly reflect the extent of their ability to characterise political views across the spectrum. We feel like this will give a more accurate reading of your politics, while still exploiting the capacities of the political compass to the full. Enjoy:
Everything's bigger in Texas
Trump doesn't support illegal immigration. It's not grandiose enough, you see.
Instead, he supports Israel, a whole state that 'immigrated' into the middle of the Middle Eastern states. Indeed, he goes to great lengths to do so.
We can see that Trump's politics are often akin to a politics of 'reality TV.' There isn't much passion so much as a pretense.
Ocasio-Cortez isn't close to a 'socialist,' as even figures within the Democratic Party have noted. Ocasio-Cortez is merely a moderate 'reformist,' if that. The overall bourgeois agenda remains the same. Yet Trump is apparently a 'fascist,' and Ocasio-Cortez more willingly a 'socialist.' The mild bourgeois political crowd are not content to leave radicalism alone, they wish for their petty dramas to seem larger-than-life by pretending that radicalism is involved. Instead of actually letting people engage with 'fascism' or 'communism,' the bourgeois electoral politics have decided that it would be safer to just re-enact a diluted version of this drama on the political arena, to assure people that there is no way out of their bourgeois 'centrist' Matrix.
In the world of bourgeois politics, they proudly hold to the old biblical saying, "All is vanity."
Instead, he supports Israel, a whole state that 'immigrated' into the middle of the Middle Eastern states. Indeed, he goes to great lengths to do so.
We can see that Trump's politics are often akin to a politics of 'reality TV.' There isn't much passion so much as a pretense.
Ocasio-Cortez isn't close to a 'socialist,' as even figures within the Democratic Party have noted. Ocasio-Cortez is merely a moderate 'reformist,' if that. The overall bourgeois agenda remains the same. Yet Trump is apparently a 'fascist,' and Ocasio-Cortez more willingly a 'socialist.' The mild bourgeois political crowd are not content to leave radicalism alone, they wish for their petty dramas to seem larger-than-life by pretending that radicalism is involved. Instead of actually letting people engage with 'fascism' or 'communism,' the bourgeois electoral politics have decided that it would be safer to just re-enact a diluted version of this drama on the political arena, to assure people that there is no way out of their bourgeois 'centrist' Matrix.
In the world of bourgeois politics, they proudly hold to the old biblical saying, "All is vanity."
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)